The International Spectator (Vol. 46, No. 4, December 2011) a publicat o recenzie a cartii mele. si Survival publicase una prin noiembrie, dar nu o pot gasi pe internet.

International Spectator: EU foreign policy and post-Soviet conflicts : stealth intervention / Nicu Popescu. – London and New York : Routledge, 2011. – xvi, 157 p. – (Routledge advances in European politics). – ISBN 978-0-415-58720-4 ; 978-0-203-83478-7 (ebk)

In this book, Nicu Popescu, Senior Research Fellow at ECFR and major expert in the Eastern European Neighbourhood, investigates the EU approach towards the conflicts that emerged in the nineties in some former Soviet republics, namely Transnistria, Abkazia, South Ossetia and Nagorno Karabakh. The publication reveals that in those areas, the EU has conducted a sort of “stealth intervention”. This raises some interesting questions to which the author tries to find an answer: what mechanisms occasionally restrain the EU in conflict management? What are its real political priorities? Can the Council’s political reluctance act as a brake on other EU external actions? (more…)

fost la sfffarsit de noiembrie la o mica discutioe la paris despre politica externa a UE. iata si conference report-ul.

EU foreign policy must not become a casualty of the euro crisis
16.12.11 @ 09:39
RELATED Frustration on eurozone crisis to mark EU-US summit EU steps back, as tensions build ahead of Congo elections Staff leaving EU diplomatic service amid bad working conditions
BY OPEN LETTER
BRUSSELS – Dear EU leaders,
EU foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton and Polish foreign minister Radek Sikorski at the EU Council (Photo: consilium.europa.eu)
We are seriously concerned about the impact that the current eurozone debt crisis is having on the external relations of the Union.
The first casualty is the time available for foreign policy. We recognise and support your efforts to overcome the current crisis but it is important that our relations with third countries do not suffer as a consequence. Important summits have been postponed and there is less time to focus on priority issues such as supporting the transitions in North Africa.
A second problem is the resources available for foreign policy. The EU’s budget for external affairs is already small and any further cuts would seriously impact on the EU’s pretensions to play a global role.
A third potential problem is access to the EU’s market. There are many voices calling for protection against ‘unfair competition’ from third countries. We consider it important to maintain an open EU market albeit access based on reciprocity as regards our strategic partners.
A fourth factor is the damage to the EU’s image as a well-governed entity, an important basis for the EU’s attraction as a soft power. Restoring the EU’s economic health would of course help repair the damage to our image.
Fifth, the US global footprint is set to decline due to budget cuts. This means that the EU will have to take more responsibility for its own security and regional security. It is important that this case is put to EU citizens.
Furthermore, ensuring the continuation of a strong liberal world order that emerged after the Second World War remains a key European interest. It is essential that emerging powers become stakeholders in that order.
Only a strong, united and self-confident EU can help strengthen and further develop global institutions and rules that are a necessity to ensure European security and prosperity.
The external relations of the EU cannot be seen as an afterthought. An inward looking EU will be at the mercy of others. And it will not be able to shape the global order according to its values and interests. Investment in foreign policy is an investment in the long-term viability of European freedom, prosperity and security.
Fraser Cameron, EU-Asia Centre
Ulrich Speck, Global Europe Initiative
Josef Janning, European Policy Centre
Pierre Defraigne , Madariaga, College of Europe Foundation
Charles Grant, Centre for European Reform
Shada Islam, Friends of Europe
Gustaaf Geererts, Brussels Institute of Contemporary China Studies
Gerald Knaus, European Stability Initiative
Nicu Popescu, European Council on Foreign Relations
Michael Emerson, Centre for European Policy Studies
Ulrike Guérot, European Council on Foreign Relations
Fabrizio Tassinari, Danish Institute for International Studies
José Ignacio Torreblanca, European Council on Foreign Relations
Jonas Parello-Plesner, European Council on Foreign Relations
Rosa Balfour, European Policy Centre
Giles Merritt, Security and Defence Agenda
Geert Cami, Friends of Europe
Richard Youngs, FRIDE
Ben Judah, European Council on Foreign Relations
Pawel Swieboda, Demos Europa
Dimitar Bechev, European Council on Foreign Relations
Sven Biscop, Egmont Institute
Stefani Weiss, Bertelsmann Stiftung
Daniel Korski, European Council on Foreign Relations
Ralf Fücks, Heinrich Böll Stiftung
Sami Andoura, Notre Europe
Jan Techau, Carnegie Europe
Heather Grabbe, Open Society Foundation
Richard Gowan, European Council on Foreign Relations
Amanda Paul, European PolicyEU foreign policy must not become a casualty of the euro crisis
16.12.11 @ 09:39
RELATED Frustration on eurozone crisis to mark EU-US summit EU steps back, as tensions build ahead of Congo elections Staff leaving EU diplomatic service amid bad working conditions
BY OPEN LETTER
BRUSSELS – Dear EU leaders,
EU foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton and Polish foreign minister Radek Sikorski at the EU Council (Photo: consilium.europa.eu)
We are seriously concerned about the impact that the current eurozone debt crisis is having on the external relations of the Union.
The first casualty is the time available for foreign policy. We recognise and support your efforts to overcome the current crisis but it is important that our relations with third countries do not suffer as a consequence. Important summits have been postponed and there is less time to focus on priority issues such as supporting the transitions in North Africa.
A second problem is the resources available for foreign policy. The EU’s budget for external affairs is already small and any further cuts would seriously impact on the EU’s pretensions to play a global role.
A third potential problem is access to the EU’s market. There are many voices calling for protection against ‘unfair competition’ from third countries. We consider it important to maintain an open EU market albeit access based on reciprocity as regards our strategic partners.
A fourth factor is the damage to the EU’s image as a well-governed entity, an important basis for the EU’s attraction as a soft power. Restoring the EU’s economic health would of course help repair the damage to our image.
Fifth, the US global footprint is set to decline due to budget cuts. This means that the EU will have to take more responsibility for its own security and regional security. It is important that this case is put to EU citizens.
Furthermore, ensuring the continuation of a strong liberal world order that emerged after the Second World War remains a key European interest. It is essential that emerging powers become stakeholders in that order.
Only a strong, united and self-confident EU can help strengthen and further develop global institutions and rules that are a necessity to ensure European security and prosperity.
The external relations of the EU cannot be seen as an afterthought. An inward looking EU will be at the mercy of others. And it will not be able to shape the global order according to its values and interests. Investment in foreign policy is an investment in the long-term viability of European freedom, prosperity and security.
Fraser Cameron, EU-Asia Centre
Ulrich Speck, Global Europe Initiative
Josef Janning, European Policy Centre
Pierre Defraigne , Madariaga, College of Europe Foundation
Charles Grant, Centre for European Reform
Shada Islam, Friends of Europe
Gustaaf Geererts, Brussels Institute of Contemporary China Studies
Gerald Knaus, European Stability Initiative
Nicu Popescu, European Council on Foreign Relations
Michael Emerson, Centre for European Policy Studies
Ulrike Guérot, European Council on Foreign Relations
Fabrizio Tassinari, Danish Institute for International Studies
José Ignacio Torreblanca, European Council on Foreign Relations
Jonas Parello-Plesner, European Council on Foreign Relations
Rosa Balfour, European Policy Centre
Giles Merritt, Security and Defence Agenda
Geert Cami, Friends of Europe
Richard Youngs, FRIDE
Ben Judah, European Council on Foreign Relations
Pawel Swieboda, Demos Europa
Dimitar Bechev, European Council on Foreign Relations
Sven Biscop, Egmont Institute
Stefani Weiss, Bertelsmann Stiftung
Daniel Korski, European Council on Foreign Relations
Ralf Fücks, Heinrich Böll Stiftung
Sami Andoura, Notre Europe
Jan Techau, Carnegie Europe
Heather Grabbe, Open Society Foundation
Richard Gowan, European Council on Foreign Relations
Amanda Paul, European Policy Centre
Tomas Valasek, Centre for European Reform
Constanze Stelzenmüller, German Marshall Fund
Almut Möller, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik Centre
Tomas Valasek, Centre for European Reform
Constanze Stelzenmüller, German Marshall Fund

Almut Möller, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige

Politik

tocmai revenit din malaezia si indonesia. voi scrie si despre asta. intre timp a aparut si aceasta scrisoare deschisa din partea mai multor experti din UE adresata liderilor UE despre riscurile crizei din zona euro pentru politica externa a UE. am semnat, dar nu am participat la scrierea scrisorii dar se pare ca de aici porneste. cam nu prea cred eu in eficacitatea scrisorilor deschise decat in cazuri foarte rare. + iata si un articol din new york times despre incidentul de la parata…

EU foreign policy must not become a casualty of the euro crisis

OPEN LETTER

BRUSSELS – Dear EU leaders,

We are seriously concerned about the impact that the current eurozone debt crisis is having on the external relations of the Union.

The first casualty is the time available for foreign policy. We recognise and support your efforts to overcome the current crisis but it is important that our relations with third countries do not suffer as a consequence. Important summits have been postponed and there is less time to focus on priority issues such as supporting the transitions in North Africa.

A second problem is the resources available for foreign policy. The EU’s budget for external affairs is already small and any further cuts would seriously impact on the EU’s pretensions to play a global role. (more…)

OpenDemocracy.net, 6 December 2011: The preliminary results from Russia’s parliamentary elections are bad news for the Kremlin. Putin’s pet party, United Russia, got slightly less than 50% and it lost its constitutional majority in the Duma. That translates into a 14% fall from the last elections in 2007 for a party that had never seen its share of the vote decline at federal elections. The question now asked is a simple one: is this just a temporary setback or the beginning of the end for Edinaya Rossia and the Putin consensus?

By the standards of Western democracies, falling just short of the 50% mark after three years of global economic crisis and 12 years in power would be a stellar victory. But in Putin’s Russia this is a serious setback for two main reasons. First of all, the elections were neither free, nor fair. Evidence of ballot stuffing is already swirling around the internet, and the election campaign was heavily biased in favour of United Russia. Federal TV channels and local authorities worked hard to persuade and pressurise people to vote for United Russia. Under normal campaign circumstances and with no ballot stuffing Putin’s party would perhaps have got somewhere closer to 30-35% of the vote. The authorities know that. This is hardly a rock-solid foundation for the supposedly Teflon President Putin who wants to be a fatherly leader of the nation for a life-time. His lifetime.

(more…)

in ultimele luni am lucrat asupta unui raport despre politica externa a Rusiei. in sfarsit a aparut – Dealing with a post-BRIC Russia

iata si cateva reactii la raport de la diverse personalitati europene

Endorsements

“This report provides an important analysis of where Russia stands today and what opportunities this brings for the EU. It will open a much-needed and interesting debate.”

Javier Solana, former EU High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy and Secretary-General of the Council of the EU; former Secretary General of NATO

“A very timely and much-needed document.”

Vaira Vike-Freiberga, former President of Latvia


“This report is extremely insightful both in its great analysis and policy recommendations proposed which touch upon both foreign, economic and energy policies. The report provides the European Union with a real working agenda.”

Massimo D’Alema, President, Italianieuropei Foundation; President, Foundation for European Progressive Studies; former Prime Minister and Foreign Minister

dupa cum am mai scris acu vreo doua saptamani – gata. a fost parafat acordul privind crearea unui spatiu aviatic comun moldova-ue. aici este ceremonia de parafare si  mai multe detalii despre acord. a fost un proiect prioritar cat am fost in guvern, am contribuit la scrisoarea din 26 august 2010 care a initiat acest proces, si am fost in echipa de negocieri condusa de victor bodiu. succesul evident se datoreaza multor oameni – si vointei politice din partea primului ministru si al negociatorului sef si a expertizei echipei de negociatori. negocierile s-au incheiat in 2 runde si 2 luni si jumatate – si asta un fel de record (georgia a negociat in 3 runde, iar Ucraina negociaza fara pea mari rezultate de 3 ani). elementele cheie: orice companie europeana poate zbura fara restrictii in moldova, si orice companie RM poate zbura fara restrictii in UE (insa companiile RM nu beneficiata de asa numita libertate a 5-a, care le-ar permite sa aiba curse intra-UE). prin urmare va fi mai multa competitie care vor duce la scaderea treptata a preturilor (care deja au scazut in ultimul an).

cele mai delicate subiecte tineau de necesitatea renuntarii la flota de avioane de tip sovietic si perioadele de tranzitie poentru aceasta. din toate aeronavele de tip sovietic numai An-26 este certificat de UE. restul tipurilor de avioane trebuie treptat scoase din registrele nationale. in cazul RM s-a convenit ca avioanele vor fi eliminate treptat pana in 2017, iar elicopterele pana in 2023.  pentru comparatie – acordul cu Georgia (pag 36) prevedea 2015 si 2019 respectiv. deci perioadele de tranzitie sunt mult mai bune (pentru companiile RM) decat sunt in cazul Georgiei. si asa – Moldova are un numar foarte restrans de nave care vor fi afectate. este vorba de intre 2 si 6 avioane care trebuie eliminate din registru pana in 2017 si de 7 elicoptere – pana in 2023 (5 elicoptere existente si alte 2 care vor fi achizitionate curand). In fond aceste cateva avioane nu mai deranjau chiar atat de mult UE, insa nu putea accepta perioade de tranzitie mai lungi pentru ca s-ar fi creat un precedent pentru Ucraina care are sute de aeronave de acest tip.

urmatorii pasi: acordul va fi semnat la Bruxelles in cateva luni – probabil februarie sau in primavara. de atunci acordul intra in vigoare iar in paralel incep procedurile de retificare in statele membre UE si RM. oricum, acordul va inra in vigoare de la data semnarii.

interviu in adevarul, saptamana trecuta

Cercetător la Consiliul European pentru Relaţii Externe, biroul de la Londra, Nicu Popescu vorbeşte despre restanţele Moldovei faţă de UE, dar şi despre „micii” paşi pe care i-am realizat în ultimul timp. Fostul consilier al premierului Vlad Filat spune că politicienii moldoveni trebuie să se ocupe mai mult de reforme, nu de scandaluri.

Cum se văd în capitalele europene scandalurile de la Chişinău şi epopeea alegerii preşedintelui ţării?

Partenerii externi, ca şi cetăţenii Moldovei, şi-ar fi dorit ca aceste dificultăţi să fie surmontate şi ca întreaga atenţie şi energie a clasei politice să se concentreze pe procesul de reforme şi modernizare a ţării. În Moldova s-a investit mult capital politic şi speranţe atât la Bruxelles, cât şi la Berlin sau Varsovia, dar există şi temerea că Moldova va repeta traiectoria Ucrainei din 2004-2009.

În Moldova s-a vorbit foarte mult despre summitul Parteneriatului Estic de la Varşovia, în care guvernanţii au pus mari speranţe, dar de la care nu ne-am ales cu nimic.

De cele mai multe ori summiturile, în special cele multilaterale, sunt nişte reuniuni care consfinţesc sau anunţă anumite progrese deja realizate şi convenite sau lansează alte iniţiative care pot deveni succese în viitor. Adevăratele progrese se realizaeză prin muncă asiduă, nu la summituri. Şi dacă vrem să înţelegem dinamica relaţiilor Moldova-Uniunea Europeană nu trebuie să ne uităm doar la acele doua zile de summit, din 29-30 septembrie, ci la câteva luni care au precedat reuniunea, şi lunile care urmează. Bunăoară, pe 16 septembrie, UE a publicat primul raport privind implementarea condiţiilor în urma cărora vom obţine liberalizarea vizelor. A fost un raport foarte pozitiv pentru Moldova, mult mai pozitiv decât cel pentru Ucraina. Un alt exemplu e că 4 octombrie Moldova a intrat, nu pe ultima sută de metri, ci pe ultimii zece metri în negocierea unui spatiu aviatic comun cu UE. Aceasta va însemna integrarea de facto a Moldovei în spaţiul aviatic comun european. Companiile noastre vor putea zbura fără restricţii în UE şi viceversa, iar carezultat şi preţurile la biletele avia vor scădea substanţial. Sunt paşi mici, dar fermi în direcţia UE, care, spre deosebire de summituri, sunt lucruri concrete, dar mai puţin vizibile în presă. (more…)

la 12 octombrie 2009 la ecfr am publicat acest policy memo despre UE-Moldova. una din recomandarile principale era: ‘Liberalise air-travel between the EU and Moldova, hopefully leading to a drastic reduction of air travel fares. Moldova’s neighbours Ukraine and Romania have more liberalised air travel markets, which makes the costs of air travel from Moldova to other European capitals up to 2-3 times more expensive than from Kiev or Bucharest. Reducing air travel costs will benefit the Moldovan diaspora and their relatives who would be able to travel more often and cheaper.’ evident, in guvern a fost unul din principalele subiecte de care m-am ocupat. si din iulie curent sunt in echipa de negociatori din partea RM pe marginea acestui subiect.

in ultimele 3 zile la Bruxelles practic s-a convenit asupra parametrilor principali din acordul privind crearea unui spatiu aviatic comun dintre Moldova si UE (iata comunicatul de presa). acest lucru va permite ca operatorii UE si cei din RM sa zboare fara restrictii intre UE si RM. aceasta libertate va genera (treptat, nu peste noapte) mai multe curse aeriene, mai multa competitie si preturi mai joase la bilete. In plus Moldova va implementa treptat standardele UE in domeniul sigurantei zborurilor, ceea ce va duce la securitate sporita pentru pasageri. treptat se va renunta si la flota de tip sovietic – insa dupa o perioada destul de lunga de tranzitie care va permite companiilor locale sa se adapteze (apropo, Moldova obtine perioade de tranzitie mai lungi decat alte state din regiune, si este un avantaj important pentru companiile aeriene din Md). va mai urma o a treia runda de negocieri si parafarea acordului, apoi acordul urmeaza a fi semnat in cateva luni (3-4-5 – din cauza procedurilor interne din UE), si din momentul semnarii va in vigoare.

acest articol (clasic si genial) de robert putnam e o descriere destul de apropiata de modul cum au decurs negocierile dintre UE si Moldova. dupa cum descrie si putnam – negociatorii de fapt negociaza pe doua planuri: intern si extern. (more…)

tocmai revenit din vacanta. asa si nu am gasit o formula eficace de organizare care mi-ar permite sa scriu mai regulat pe blog. mai incerc. pana atunci – au mai aparut doua publicatii recente. una in revista Pro et Contra, publicata de Carnegie Moscow despre sistemul politic din Moldova (in traducerea din eng in rusa s-au pierdut careva nuante, dar asta e) si alta e How to Influence Neighbours in Internationale Politik. mai scriu un studiu mai mare pe Post-BRIC Russian Foreign Policy, si un articol mai academic despre politica de vize si sentimentele anti0imigrationiste din UE.

pentru cunoscatorii de poloneza – iata sumarul discutiei pe care am avut-o la Fundatia Batory in Polonia la prezentarea studiului despre PEV: Turning Presence into Power

Next Page »